PUCL Bulletin, 2003
The return to Muthanga
-- By C.K Janu and M. Geethanandan
The Adivasi decision is to return to Muthanga. The Adivasis had become victims of untold brutalities. Yet there is no other way but to return. And the Adivasis have been made refugees in their homeland. There are the spirits of the dead in the forestlands of Muthanga. Not only Jogi, but also the bodies and souls of all those who had lived here as one with nature have merged irrevocably with the soil. None can separate them now. Anyone who enters Muthanga can see the scattered coins in front of the Sacred Temple at Thakarappady. There is also a splintered bamboo there. This was the hundi ( Coin collection box)of the Adivasis, smashed by the police officers and the goondas as though it was some part of the weaponry of the Adivasis. No one would pick up the coins. These coins represe! nting the beliefs and dreams would still be there when they return .
Those
Who See the Theyyam
.and Those Who Hear Also
(Theyyam - A folk dance)
2-3 January 2003: Adivasis who commenced their journey from various
villages from different parts of Wayanad district belonging to different
communities at Pulithookky and Thiruvannur colonies. Pulithookky
is a colony ravaged by hunger deaths. Pulithookky has been in the news
in full glare. Those who reached Pulithookky the aged, the ailing,
the women, the youth, those who stopped their formal studies, the infants
came for a new life.
They came with sacks full of miseries, the thudi (A traditional drum), the household and agricultural instruments, materials to construct their homes, the whicker and oil to light the lamp at the temple at Ambukuthy . a line of thousands of refugees going to their ancestral lands. Those who returned to Muthanga conversed with the spirits of the mountains with ease, as though they got back their freedom that they lost centuries ago. They, the Paniya, the Adiya, the Bettakuruma, the Kaattunayaka, the Kurichia etc, belonging to all the tribes of Wayanad, woke up their gods in unison. Even before going to Muthanga, they had woken up their gods and got their permission. They did not need to consider any other force beyond this, and definitely not that of the state.
The
Remnants of Muthanga
Muthanga is a protected area under state laws. Entry without permission
is punishable. None except the wildlife and the officers can enter. But
none of the laws could protect Muthanga. Only the remnants of the ravaged
nature remain there. Parched fields, dried up mountain streams, the eucalyptus
trees that suck out the last of the water sources, open empty land for
kilometers, the desperately thirsty roaming elephants
. The only
thing that had survived the ravages in Muthanga from centuries ago was
the temples of Adivasis. These symbols of belief
the belief in the
immense power of nature stood somehow firmly rooted. Just two decades
ago, Muthanga was a place of rich biodiversity. Swampy lands, numerous
streams, wild trees, diverse wild life and Adivasi tribes symbiotically
related to nature.
By the 1980s the forests were wiped clean of the vegetation for the Birlas. Eucalyptus trees were planted. 77 square kilometers of Muthanga range was completely wiped out. The Adivasis were also evicted. This forest land was earlier taken over by the government from private landlords. The Adivasis should have been protected in these lands by law. But instead, the majority was evicted. Only 10 Adivasi hamlets and about 250 non-Adivasi families were permitted to remain in Muthanga range. Many of those who had gone to Muthanga were those who had ancestral claims.
The
Destruction of Biodiversity
Officially, the interpretation is that Muthanga is part of Nilgiri Biosphere
and fall within the core of Bandipur Reserve. What replaced
the evicted tribal gods? Bandipur of Karnataka; Mudumalai of Tamilnadu;
Muthanga Range, Tholpatti Range and Sultan Batheri Range of Wayanad District;
Nagarhole of Karnataka; Silent valley of Kerala
all fall within
the Nilgiri Biosphere. More than 3000 diverse species make these areas
qualify as a protected area. Disregarding the importance of the biosphere,
the biodiversity was completely wiped out in Muthanga Range that was vested
forests. After the complete destruction of the nature in Muthanga, this
area was recommended by the State to the Centre for consideration to be
brought under the category of protected area. There are no
natural forests in Karadimunda (1,304.93 hectares), Maragatha (2,055 hectares),
Thottamoola (1,961.68 hectares) and Noolpuzha (2,017 hectares) of Muthanga
Range. Muthanga had become uninhabitable on a permanent basis for any
wild life. More than 8,000 acres of land is completely barren. The Adivasis
had put up their homes in this barren land.
The
Thirsty Elephants
It is a small wild river that divides the Bandipur Reserve of Karnataka
and Mudumalai Reserve of Tamilnadu from Muthanga Range. This wild river
called Maamana Allam (Chelithodu) was the traditional water source for
the elephants and other wild life of Bandipur Reserve. Years before, this
small wild river had completely dried up along with the destruction of
the forests and establishment of eucalyptus plantations. With the loss
of all water sources, the river is but a few kilometer stretch of white
sand. The painful attempts of the elephants to dig holes in the sand in
the dried up river bed searching desperately for water is a constant sight.
This presents the other side of the saga of the disrupted lives of Adivasis. The elephants searching for water source wander around crossing the Muthanga Range to Noolpuzha located east of NH 212. This was not because Noolpuzha was the traditional water source of the elephants. Muthanga did not also have a regular elephant path. The elephants now have no other alternative. But Noolpuzha, located east of Muthanga, is also drying up. The water of Noolpuzha has also been dammed just below at the edge of the Wild Life Sanctuary Office. The water is pumped out to the Sultan Batheri town as well as to other panchayats and this is a cause for the destruction of Noolpuzha. The forest and wild life officials ensures the protection of the Nilgiri Biosphere in this manner.
The
Abode of Mafias
Most of the biodiversity of Muthanga has been sucked out by the parallel
economic system of progress in Sultan Batheri, Kalloor and Naykatty area.
A mafia power base has been created here years ago. The elephant tusks
and sandalwood from Bandipur area were regularly transported with ease
through the forest path adjacent to the Muthanga Forest Check Post. It
was indeed Ponkuzhi, Thakarappady and Muthanga that constituted the free
base of the poachers and the liquor mafia. The establishment of the sandalwood
factory here was taking into consideration this possibility of links with
the mafias. With the reduction in sandalwood, elephant tusks and trees,
they became the implementers of foreign funded projects. Many became respectable.
A strong coalition of forest contractors, professional environmentalists and forest officials soon emerged. Projects worth crores such as Elephant 2000 project, the water conservation project at Thakarappady, electric fencing project etc were implemented here. The forest-wild life officials are not far away when it came to providing protection to those who hunt down herds of deers which are then parceled off, while 4 or 5 domesticated elephants are used farcically to deceive the tourists. The basic problems of the wild life that come to Muthanga are ignored even as crores are lost. The task of reviving the wild forest stream that separates the Bandipur Reserve from Muthanga Range is quietly covered up by the forest-wild life officials.
The Adivasi Gothra Mahasabha established the check posts on the pathway that skirted the official forest check post at the point where this pathway joined the NH 212. It may be recollected that it was the nature lovers of Wayanad District who had actively protested and succeeded to forestall the demand to erect check posts beyond Muthanga at Ponkuzhi. They had then raised the issue of protection of elephants to subvert this as they did ! this time too. Both, the Adivasis and elephants, are the victims of these pests who cart away the finance capital.
The State that Lost All Moral Rights and The Preparation for Self Rule
The coalition fronts did not believe in the rule of law. Neither do they
recognize Adivasis and Dalits as citizens. The rulers had flung to the
winds the Article 244 of the Indian Constitution, the restoration of alienated
land act of 1975, the 1974 vested forest act where half of the vested
forests thus taken over was to be given to the Adivasis and numerous court
orders with utter contempt. And the latest in this saga was when the agreement
of 16 October 2001 of the government with the Dalit-Adivasi Samara Samithy
was ignored. The Adivasis who returned to Muthanga commenced implementing
each of the provisions of the agreement one by one and began a life where
all the civil rights are protected in an ideal manner.
It was the beginning of integrating the diversity of the various tribes and commencement of a village life capable of self-rule. The tribal life recreated through the numerous gram sabha meetings were wonderfully transformed in the forestlands of Ambukuthy, Thakarappady and Ponkuzhi through the collective will power and labour. The rhythm that the tribal communities lost was reestablished through the protection of the forests, putting up huts and preparation of the lands for cultivation. Besides the establishment of three schools for the children, a public distribution center, an initiative for health care in the preparatory stage and a special project for the protection of wild life and environment, the Muthanga area became totally liquor free. Check posts were established by the Adivasis to demarcate the lines clearly to prevent the encroachment tendencies of the general public.
This was to focus the attention against those who wished to come to the neighborhood of their lives. The proud bearers of the bows and arrows stood guard – a symbol of the pride of tribal life. But the celebration of the slaves of their existence was not tolerable to the owners of wealth. The Chief Minister Antony, the Forest Minister Sudhakaran and others understood the proclamation of self-rule in Muthanga as a challenge to the State. The Speaker of the law making Assembly proclaimed aloud that the Adivasis should be shot dead, despite the fact that the Adivasis did not do anything that could be construed as criminal.
Re-establishing
Law and Order
The Adivasi villages are currently discussing the 1996 Panchayat Raj (Extension
to the Scheduled Areas Act) the new legislation related to the
Panchayat Raj Act. The prevention of land alienation, the restoration
of illegally alienated lands, ownership of minor forest produce, the right
to ban liquor, control of local institutions, control over money lending,
control over local market, command over resources and planning for local
development are all intended to make the villages self-reliant. The law
on this was passed by the Indian parliament in 1996. The Muthanga struggle
arena was the cry for establishing social justice and rights over resources
within the parameters of this law.
The
Denial of Right to Act
The whites believed that the blacks did not have souls. There are the
university academics who believe that Adivasis lack the capacity to act
on their own as do those intellectuals who are in touch with the forest
department. There are those in Kerala who think that the Adivasis are
vanavasis like the elephant, the leopard and the wild buffalo.
The foreigners, foreign loan providing agencies, the developmentalists
who are the favourites of funding projects, pure environmentalists, Hindutvavadis
all share this opinion viewed from different corners though. All
their intensions are to protect the wild life and forests by bringing
the tribals outside the forests and into the mainstream. The fundamental
basis of their love for environment is their hatred to their brethren.
Their development projects have till date neither saved wild life, nature or human beings. The remains! both the wiped out hills of Muthanga and the displaced Adivasis from Muthanga are proof of this development. Their last word is the AHADS (Attapady Hill Area Development Society a project set up with Japanese funding) model. In the ultimate analysis, only the crores from foreign loans that reach their hands are the prime moving force for human action. They forget that this is very much the key element that reproduces the criminal mafia culture in Kerala. There was immense potential for action in the collectivity of tribal life. Nature could be recreated. It is only that they should not be denied the opportunity to recover the rhythm of life. They tried this in Muthanga.
The
Racist Face of State Terror
17 February 2003: As far as the accomplishment of the organized brute
force of power, there is no other parallel in the history of Kerala as
that took place in Muthanga. It came as a wild forest fire. The mafia
gangs, protected by the administration and the police, set fire to the
northern part of the Muthanga Wild Life Sanctuary. Hundreds of Adivasis
would have been burnt to ashes in the long war against the fire that lasted
for hours. No administrative official demanded of the Adivasis even to
leave the place to save their own lives. The strategy of war adopted by
the State/mafia alliance failed though. The mafia gang who set fire to
the forests, along with the officials, fell into the hands of Adivasis.
Even then the Adivasis demanded that the law be enforced. The criminals
were produced in front of the magistrate in full view of the masses. The
criminals were taken over by the State but then the government set free
the mafia g! ang. The State, which has lost all sense of decency, could
not but unleash its terrorist face. A war with racial overtones was unleashed
on 19 February in Muthanga.
The
Criminal Tribes
The hundreds of Adivasis...from infants to women
.who were brutally
attacked were locked up in prisons as accused in 7 criminal cases. Hundreds
of cases have been registered across Kerala against Adivasis for demanding
a place in their land of their birth. Branding Adivasis as criminals
was but the age-old tradition of the British. The surrender drama of the
forest looters was enacted in an organized manner after which they were
set free from the cases. And of course the forest department is carrying
out the responsibility to protect the forests in many parts
of Kerala. And they have been writing newer scripts in branding the Adivasis
as the accused. Just as the American State searched for evidence of chemical
weapons in Iraq, the Antony government was searching for evidences of
links to PWG, LTTE etc.
All that they could get were the coins that lay scattered, broken vessels and thudis. What was burnt down was a culture! of a people. There has been attempts from different quarters to paint those areas in red colour with stories of extremism areas where for many years now those socially segregated from Keralas political map, especially the Adivasis and Dalits, have dared act. The professional human rights activists, journalists, the leadership in the ruling political system etc have done this. These are but modern tactics for racial isolation. At last they propagated that there were special intellectual centers to direct the Adivasis to wrong paths. The intention behind these was to ensure the destruction of the emergence of a new socio-political force from amongst the Adivasis and its transformation to a new force of renaissance. It is not possible to eliminate a process of renaissance through force of arms or false propaganda. The sections of people who attain consciousness of their own will some d! ay find a place of their own in a democratic society. All peoples who are denied the rights to resources, social justice and self-rule will gain self-confidence from such struggles.
C.K Janu
Chairperson
Adivasi Gothra Mahasabha
Vyapara Bhawan
Mananthavady Post
Wayanad District
Kerala
India 670 645
E-mail: mutthanga@hotmail.com
[Translated from the original Malayalam titled Muthangayilekkulla Thirichhupokku Oru Sathyavangmoolam released on 31 May 2003]
==========================================================================================
Police Outrage in Muthanga
REPORT OF JOINT FACT-FINDING TEAM OF THREE BANGALORE-BASED HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATIONS
The following is extracted from the report of a joint fact-finding team of Vigil India Movement, SICHREM and People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) of Karnataka, three Bangalore-based human rights organisations, which visited Muthanga, where police had fired on Adivasi agitators on February 19, 2003.
A team constituted by three human rights organizations in Bangalore—Vigil India Movement, SICHREM and PUCL---undertook a fact-finding mission on the police firing and excesses on tribals in Waynad district of Kerala. The following were the members of the team: Mr. Mathews Phillip, Executive Director of SICHREM, Mr. R. Manohar, Vice President of PUCL-Karnataka, Mr. Joseph Bernard, media activist, and Mr. Saji Thomas, Coordinator of Vigil India Movement. The team visited Muthanga, the scene of the firing, Nambikolli on Sultan Bathery-Ooty Road, where Ms. C.K. Janu and Mr. M. Geethanandan were arrested, and Pulithooky tribal settlement in Noolpuzha panchayat, and talked to several eyewitnesses to the incidents and other persons, including Adivasis.
About 1,000 families entered the Muthanga forest range in small groups with their possessions and settled down there from Jan 4 onwards. Their settlement was peaceful, causing no hindrance to the inhabitants of neighbouring localities. They had with them no firearms or other lethal weapons.
On Feb 17 morning some persons set fire to the new habitation of Adivasis at Thagarapadi in the Muthanga range by throwing lighted, kerosene-soaked dry elephant dung. The Adivasis immediately put out the fire. They also detained 21 persons, including forest officials, who entered their new habitations on Feb 17 evening. They believed that these persons were responsible for the arson. All tof them were released on Feb 18 after a dialogue between the members of the AGM on the one hand and the District Collector, Mr. K. Gopalan, and forest and police officers on the other. None of the hostages was subjected to physical torture.
According to eyewitnesses, on Feb 19 morning at 7am a major police operation got under way. An estimated 500 policemen entered the Muthanga forest, and at 9.45 am they started indiscriminate firing of teargas shells, followed by brutal lathi-charge. The Adivasis retaliated with bows and arrows, sticks and agricultural implements. Several women, including some pregnant women, aged persons and children sustained grievous hurt, including head injuries and multiple fractures. Some media persons who were witnesses to these attacks also came under attack and sustained injuries. After some time the Adivasis retreated to inner forests. Police burnt their huts and unleashed brutal violence against all those who were around, who were actually children, women and the aged who could not run away.
The first phase of police action was over by 11.30 am. Finding that the Adivasis did not posses any firearms or other weapons, police chased them into the forest. The Adivasis took two police constables and a forest official as hostages. Police resorted to firing at 12.45 pm. Three Adivasis were injured. The Adivasis handed over to authorities one hostage, who was seriously injured. They also asked for the service of a doctor to attend to the injured Adivasis and hostages. The Adivasis took media persons to their camp to show the hostages and allowed them to take their photographs. Instead of negotiating with the AGM for the release of the detained police constable and the forest official, police started indiscriminate firing and lathi charge at 5.45 pm, after threatening and chasing the media people out. This resulted in casualties. The government version is that only two persons were killed in the incidents: an Adivasi, Mr. Jogi, died in the police firing, and Vinod, police constable, died of injuries inflicted after he was taken hostage. However many are missing even now, about two weeks after the incidents. This raises a presumption that many might have been killed during the operation. Immediately after the police operation, the place was closed and even the media was denied access to the area for 15 hours. This raises the suspicion that the police wants to hide something from the people.
The official version is that police firing was inevitable as a policeman and a forest official were taken hostages and the AGM was planning a violent struggle. This can be rebutted on the following grounds.
The forest department officials who were taken hostages on Feb 17 were released the next day. None of them was physically tortured or harmed. Even on Feb 19 the hostage who was seriously wounded was voluntarily handed over for medical treatment.
The Gothra Mahasabha volunteers had approached the
authorities with a request for providing assistance of a doctor to treat
the police official and the Adivasis injured in the first round of
police firing at about 12.45 pm on Feb 19.
Media persons present in the area and those who
visited the two injured officials have testified that the two had not
suffered any fatal injuries. Had timely medical attention been given,
the life of the policeman could have been saved.
Between 12.45 pm and 5.45 pm, the police and other
officials were engaged in planning a further attack without making any
effort for mediation and peaceful settlement. The police acted in utter
disregard for the safety and security of the hostage policeman in
resorting to firing without trying to negotiate. For the above reasons
we conclude that the police firing at Muthanga was unjustified and
avoidable.
Findings & Recommendations
The Kerala Government should try and resolve the issue through an amicable settlement with the Adivasis. It must immediately begin negotiations with the Gothra Mahasabha leaders and implement the promises made to them in the agreement of October 6, 2001.
It has been officially confirmed that the police
fired 18 rounds in Muthanga on February 19. But only very few people
with bullet injuries have so far been admitted to hospitals. It can be
reasonably presumed that many with bullet wounds are missing. The
government with the involvement of civil society groups should try to
find the missing people, some of whom may be wandering in the forests.
The police have in their possession all details of the people who had
participated in the struggle in the Muthanga forests. It should publish
the list so that others may not be falsely implicated.
The State government is duty bound to ensure that all
Adivasis who went to settle in Muthanga forest have returned to their
respective places.
The State government must immediately stop unlawful
arrests and torture of innocent people. Police must stop terrorising
Adivasis in their colonies.
Livelihood of about 1,000 Adivasi families who went
to settle in Muthanga has been destroyed by the police action. The
government must immediately provide livelihood assistance to ensure the
survival of these families. This includes free ration, medical
assistance etc. Otherwise there is every chance of many hunger deaths in
Adivasi colonies.
The government must give compensation to the
relatives of the Adivasis who died or were injured in the police action.
Compensation for the deceased Adivasis must be on the same basis as has
been announced for the police constable. The government must not
discriminate between citizens who died due to unjustifiable, avoidable
and indiscriminate firing and the police personnel who died in the same
action. The government must immediately order a judicial
inquiry into the events of February, including the circumstances that led
to the police action. Such an inquiry is necessary to determine whether
the police firing was justified.
Source: VIGILGROUP@uk.msnusers.com