NGO Initiatives
Some features of NGO interventions
Most efforts at improving quality of government education are not widely known, and given the extent of the problem, there seems to be not many such efforts.
Patterns of Interventions
1. Efforts focusing on specific subject like Eklavya’s Science and Social science programme, Suvidya’s mathemathic programe, Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Teaching, Centre for Science Education & Communications
2. Unconventional areas of Curriculum eg Health, environmental education: CEHAT, FRCH, BVIEER, Uttarkhand Seva Nidhi, Khog, and Abacus in teaching History for Communal Harmony, Vigyan Ashram: rural technology
3. Whole School Approach: through
Primary School curriculum (Prashika programme of Eklavya, Bodh, Rishi Valley)
Teacher training, educational materials support (CWC, Bodh,)
Inclusive Education (Seva-in-action, Karnataka)
School Adoption, school management/leadership development (CEMD, Delhi)
4. Language Teaching:
eg Pragat Shikshan Sanstha-reading curriculum, teacher traininig
Pratham- reading instruction with help of co-teacher
Alaripu, - Library & theatre
Centre for Learning Resources – English through radio
5. Accoutability Approach
Community Mobilisation- Jahangirpuri school project of Delhi University, MAYA (Karnataka)
Participation of Children – CWC
Test-based and incentive driven accountability, Asim Premji Foundation
( Adapted from: Omproving the Quality of Government Schools: by Mnadira Kumar & Padma M Sarangapani. Sutraddhar. Books for change.2005.[B.N30.M2])
The Intervention of NGOs have been mainly by
1. developing curriculum materials
2. teaching – learning experiences
3. Teacher Training
4. School based Support
NGOs
Eklavya
Mumbai: Khoj, Abacus
Pratham
In the seventies, Nirmala Niketan College of Social Work took an initiative to work with municipal schools in Mumbai. It was the first time a partnership of this kind had been forged between an educational institution and the municipal corporation. We wanted to demonstrate how social services help for the education of the marginalised.
The way we see it is that the BMC has to be accountable to its
citizens. Citizens should be able to work together with the BMC, and not
antagonise it. Thus, Pratham was born in Mumbai in 1994, committed to the cause
of universalisation of primary education. Although it was technically set up as
a nongovernment organisation (NGO), it is really a platform that brings together
the local self-government, the corporate sector and the voluntary sector.
The Sarva Shikshan Abhiyan of the State is modelled on the Pratham pattern. It incorporates a community-based monitoring system. The Pratham model is cheap, low-cost and replicable; it uses existing resources- "your resource, our mechanism". By 2002, the organisation has spread to 21 cities, (ten of which are in Maharashtra). - Pratham - preparing the very young, Farida Lambay, Humanscape, 01/10/2002, /eldoc/n00_/01oct02HUS.pdf
Non-formal
Education Guaranatee Scheme Schools
Shikasha Karmi
Muktangan (Lok Jumbish)
Vikramshala (West Bengal)
Agragamee ( Orissa)
Digantar
Bodh
Urmul RajasthanElementary Education for the Poorest and other Deprived Groups: The Real Challenge of Universalisation, Jha, Jyotsna & Jhingran, Dhir, Centre for Policy Research, 01/06/2002, N00.23 pg 191- 228
India Education Report, Govinda, R, Oxford University Press, 01/01/2002, N21.G.1.R , 59-71
Jeevan Nirvah Niketan (JNN) is an open school in a slum in Mumbai started by a retired school principal in the early 1990s. When Snehasadan established 15 homes for street-children in the same area, it had to adopt a multi-pronged approach as regards their education. Those who managed to pick up fast were admitted to the formal school. Those who could not were admitted to the open school. In 1996, when the Mumbai Police rescued child-prostitutes from red-light areas and sent them for rehabilitation to shelter homes in the same area, the necessity for an open school for girls who could not adjust with the mainstream education came up. The third category of students in the open school are the child workers from the locality. The shelter homes constructed a new building to house the open school. Now, the open school has a huge building with all modern amenities, well-equipped units for technical and vocational training, and school buses. It provides placement for the students in professional social work institutions. The success story of JNN has inspired the State government to replicate this model in all educationally deprived areas of the State.
Anjina recalls,
"When I asked them
if they would like to read and write, most of them answered in the
affirmative."
A devotee of Sai Baba, she approached the trustees of the Sai Temple,
then
under construction in Sector 40 of NOIDA. Not everyone
was happy at the prospect of these
children studying in the temple premises. However, after some
persua-sion,
they permitted her to use the sec-ond floor of the temple to run her
non-formal
education centre. The children are graded not according to their age
but
according to their learning abilities. Once their level is decided,
they
are taught from appropriate books. For instance, all new students,
irrespective
of their ages, are placed in level I. Exams are held at regular
intervals
to assess them and their learning capabilities. Accordingly, they are
promoted
to the next level. Promotion to the next level need not be only at the
end of the year but can hap-pen after every exam. These are usually
held
after every three months. The school has classes till level V, which is
equivalent to standard V in the regular schools. It follows the CBSE
pattern
and the books are those recommended by the CBSE. The children who do
well
are promised enrolment in the regular school in Vazidpur after level V.
Meanwhile, efforts are also on
to find other schools that would accept them once they complete their
studies
at Sai Shiksha Sansthan.
Then the students of the senior
level shift to three classrooms of a school at a distance of about half
a kilometer. Another set of 80 students, mainly of the Vth level, join
them there. Anjina says that the response of the school administration
has been encouraging. They have even asked some of the girls from IXth
and Xth classes to adopt one child each. These senior students help
them
with their schoolwork, and take arts, crafts and dance classes for them
after regular school hours.- Teach the
children, Anand
Jha,
Humanscape, 11/01/2002, /eldoc/n00_/11jan02HUS4.pdf
The 'biggest and most comprehensive primary education project for
Calcutta's deprived 'urban children' is the result of a joint venture
between government agencies, NGOs and industry, which have formed the
State Resource Group for Education' of Deprived Urban Children.
The first task of the Group, set up 1999, was to conduct a survey in
all 141 city wards to identify how many children were out of school
because of "high hidden costs of school, lack of facilities, schools
being far away, school environment not being child-friendly, pressures
of sibling care school timing not being suitable".- School for all, all in school, MADHUMITA BHATTACHARYYA,
Telegraph, 09/04/2001, /eldoc/n21_/09apr01tel1.pdf
Pre-school coverage for
universalization of primary education dominated Pratham’s efforts
in the mid 1990s. Pratham’s low cost and replicable model of
community based pre-school provision led to a rapid expansion of the balwadi
(pre-school) network across the slum areas of the city. In 1995, there
were 200 Pratham balwadis catering to 4000
pre-school age children. By 1996, the number had risen to 350,
reaching 7000 children between the ages of three and five. By
1998, the pre-school network had expanded extensively across
the city; through approximately 3000 balwadis, close to 55,000
children had access to affordable early childhood education.
....How does pre-school help
children in primary school? Would all of the children attending
Pratham balwadis have enrolled in formal schools anyway? How
has Pratham’s balwadi activity helped to bring every child to
school or helped them to learn better? Estimates suggest that in the
1999-2000 school year, a third of all children who entered Std I in the
municipal school system with some exposure to early childhood education
were from Pratham balwadis. Pratham’s own figures
showed that unless the child’s family moves out of Mumbai, practically
all children go on to the formal education system – whether
it is private schools or government or municipal schools. Enrollment
in Std I in a city like Mumbai is very high. With or without
pre-school, most six year olds are children are enrolled in
Std I.
In 2000-2001, a study sampled approximately 4000 Std I children in municipal schools across Mumbai and compared children who had exposure to early childhood education with those who had none. The study suggests that in this context the real ‘value-added’ of pre-schools has to do with attendance and achievement.
Overall, the data suggest early cognitive advantage of children who have been to pre-school. Children with a pre-school background scored significantly higher in the first test in Std I in language and maths as compared to children without exposure to preschool. This is especially true for Marathi medium schools. Although there may be problems with the measurement of children’s academic progress in school and questions about the accuracy and reliability of attendance data, analyses based on the school system’s own figures do show the comparative advantage of a child who has been to pre-school before.
- Pratham experiences, Rukmini Banerji, Seminar, 01/02/2005, /eldoc/n21_/01feb05SEM31.html
Amongst those who face extreme difficulty in accessing schooling are children of urban slum dwellers and migrants. Even when their parents value education and go to some lengths to admit children to schools, they find private schools (even if government aided and not charging tuition fees) beyond their reach. As for municipal schools, they are widely seen as boring, unattractive, marked by ineffective teaching-learning – in other words, as being ‘good only for the poor’. The first case study in this section presents the work of Pratham, an NGO that has done stellar work with municipal schools in Mumbai. Its emphasis, throughout, has been on strengthening the capabilities of government schools as also on helping children cope with the burdens of learning. Pratham also realised early on that a uniform strategy would not suit all children in scattered slums.
Pratham
has
chosen to be a supporter rather than a critic of the government,
operating
on the premise that since education is a state subject, it is the state
that should be held accountable. Intervention ought to be directed at
reform
and improvement through consultation and participation of all involved
parties rather than on designing alternative or parallel systems. Since
revitalisation of the government system requires both financial and
human
resources, Pratham has sought to forge a triangular relationship
between
community, government and corporate donors. Municipal teachers,
corporate
sector personnel, NGOs, social workers and academics have been brought
together in a partnership to rejuvenate the school and help the child.
- Backward
and Forward Linkages that Strengthen Primary Education, Vimala
Ramachandran, Economic & Political Weekly, 08/03/2003, /eldoc/n21_/Primary-Edu.htm
THE civic authorities are high on
euphoria on World Literacy Day
today, what with their annual enrolment-drive
among primary school children ove.r-shooting the magic 25,000-mark by a
substan-tial 3,433 children. But before full marks are awarded, let the
gullible be warned a simple perusal of attendence sheets in the civic
schools where the children were enrolled not a month ago indicates that
60 per cent of the children have dropped out. The reason? The
plan failed to account for the fact that most of the children targeted
were street children, who feel they can spend their time more
pro-ductively outside the confines of school.
...The children, on the other hand blame the teachers for their
disinterest. Most of them complain that they are either rude or ig-nore
them completely, because of which they don't feel like they "belong".
Some of them are also beaten, they claim. Parroting alien rhymes like
"Twinkle twin-kle little star" and "A for apple" is the clincher. So,
they simply leave, free uniforms notwith-standing. Says Imran (7), "I
might as well con-tinue begging at traffic signals. That way, I
earn at least Rs 40 and don't have to take or-ders from a teacher."
- BMC flunks school as kids stay away, Indian Express, 08/09/2000,
/eldoc/n22_/8sep00ie1.pdf
Children have a fundamental right to proper development, irrespective of their age, social class and gender. In contrast, according to latest government figures (Multi Indicator Survey, 2001, Department of Women and Child Development, MHRD and UNICEF), only 48% of children have access to preschool facilities; the actual reality is likely to be much lower. Overall, growth monitoring of only 27% children less than five years is done; of those weighed 22% are found to have low birth weight. This effectively means that a quarter of our children are at risk of ill-health right from the start. 62% of children in the second year have not completed immunization; 25% of children are not immunized at all. While there is a now considerable stress on ensuring the needs of school age children, the needs of the very young are ignored.
There
is a need to recognize the distinctive nature of early childhood and
plan for it accordingly. These efforts fall under the framework
of Early Childhood Care and Development (ECCD) which by definition
involves providing the necessary support for every child to realize
his/her right to survival, protection and care and ensuring optimal
development from birth to the age of eight years. The government
has repeatedly stated that ensuring the needs of young children
is a matter of priority which is reflected in its policies and
programmes.
While the recent move to make education as a fundamental right is
a step in the right direction, it has effectively meant the dilution
of the government’s commitment to ensure education and care for
children under six (which were earlier included in the state’s
commitment
to ensuring education for all children under fourteen years of age).
- A
people's preschool, Anjela R. V. Taneja and Ira Joshi, Seminar,
01/02/2005, /eldoc/n21_/01feb05SEM44.html
- Literacy Drive, Sujeet
Rajan, INDIAN EXPRESS, 16 SEPT
2001, /eldoc/n21_/16sep01ie1.pdf
- FOR THESE TOPPERS, IT'S BEEN A HARD DAY'S NIGHT, BUT THE SLOG HAS
PAID, Shabnam Minwalla, Times of India, 25/06/2000, /eldoc/n22_/25jun00toi1.pdf
- The Free School in Amritsar helps free the minds of slum
children, NIDHI SHARMA, Outlook, 11/02/2002, /eldoc/n24_/11feb02out1.pdf
- The school a slum built, VlDYA SHIVADAS, Indian Express,
20/05/2001, /eldoc/n24_/20may01ie1.pdf
- Married to a cause, HIRAL DAVE, Indian Express, 06/09/2004, /eldoc/n30_/06sep04ie1.html
- Opening the doors to a new world, Abha Sharma, Deccan
Herald, 16/03/2003, /eldoc/n30_/16mar03dh4.htm
- Man with a mission, VASANTH MALAVI, Deccan Herald,
07/02/2003, /eldoc/n30_/man_with_mission.html
- It's more Meljol with children, Indian Express, 20/03/2001, /eldoc/n21_/20mar01ie1.pdf
- The
Neelasandra experience, Shoba
Raja, Humanscape,
01/07/2001, /eldoc/n00_/01jul01HUS4.pdf
********************************************************************************************************************************************
Reports
1. Elementary Education for the Poorest and other Deprived Groups:
The
Real Challenge of Universalisation, Jha, Jyotsna & Jhingran,
Dhir,
Centre for Policy Research, 01/06/2002, N00.23
- Education and the
Urban
Poor- pg 191-228
2. India Education Report, Govinda, R, Oxford University Press,
01/01/2002, N21.G.1.R ,
- Education of
Urban Disadvantaged
Children by Vandana Chakrabarty- Ch 5 pg 59-71
3. India Education Report, Govinda, R, Oxford University Press,
01/01/2002, N21.G.1.R ,
- Role and
contribution of NGOs in Basic Education- Ch 10 pg 121- 130
4. Public Report on Basic Education in India, Oxford University
Press,
01/01/1999, N21.P.1,
- Ch 8 pg 95-113
5. Door Step School - Annual Report, July 2002-June 2003,
Door Step
School, 01/10/2003, R.N30.12,
6. Background information on VOICE, N21.49
7. Science
education
Teaching
Methodology
Teachers Training
- Looking back To the Future - A Triannual Report of the Eklavya
Foundation for the years 1998-2001, Eklavya Foundation, 01/12/2001,
R.N20.5
8. NFE,
Education and Child Labourers,
- Elementary Education and Child Labour in India, Oonk, Gerard,
MV
Foundation, 01/04/1998, R.N21.19
9. Swadhar Akshardeep - A Report 1998-2003, Akshardeep,
R.N21.39
10. Education and Child Labourers
Democratic Education
-
The Concerned for Working Children - Annual Report 2003, The
Concerned
for Working Children, 01/01/2003 R.N21.33,
11. Educate A Child Discover A Personality, Each One Teach One
Charitable,
01/01/2003, R.N21.35
12. Pratham, Mumbai Education Initiative, D'Monte, Darryl,
Pratham,
13/01/1998, R.N21.9
13. Maths Education
Curriculum
development
- Suvidya - Collected Papers, Suvidya, 01/01/2001, R.N24.10
14. Govt -NGO joint venture
Curriculum
Development
- Samvaad: Towards a Dialogue, AVEHI, 01/01/1995, R.N24.1
15. Curriculum
Development
Science
education
- EKLAVYA - The Spirit of Innovation In Education, EKLAVYA,
R.N30.10
16. Alternative
Curriculum Schools
- Prayas - Experiences in Partnership - Vigyan Ashram, Singh,
Manju,
CAPART, R.N30.7
17. Mel
Jol Hum Bacchon Ka, Annual Report, 1993-94, R.N21.57
Books:
1. recheck books.
see vimamal ramachandranWebsites: